4.8 Article

Different gene expression profiles between microsatellite instability-high and microsatellite stable colorectal carcinomas

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 23, 期 37, 页码 6218-6225

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207853

关键词

colorectal carcinomas; microsatellite instability; oligonucleotide microarray; gene expression profile; molecular classification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent molecular genetic studies have revealed that two major types of genomic instabilities, chromosomal instability (CIN) and microsatellite instability (MSI), exist in colorectal carcinomas. In order to clarify the molecular signature related to the CIN and MSI in colorectal carcinomas, we performed transcriptomic expression analysis on eight microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) colorectal carcinomas and compared the results obtained with that of nine microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal carcinomas using oligonucleotide microarrays containing 17 334 known genes and 1331 unknown genes or expression sequence tags ( ESTs). Unsupervised two-way hierarchical clustering with 5724 genes successfully classified tumors from normal mucosa, and displayed a distinctive MSI-H carcinomas subgroup. Based on intensive filtering, 57 known genes and eight ESTs were found to be highly relevant to the differentiation of MSI-H and MSS colorectal carcinomas. These genes successfully distinguish the new test set of six MSI-H and five MSS colorectal carcinomas. Many up- and downregulated genes in MSI-H colorectal carcinomas were related to the previously reported phenotypic characteristics; increased mucin production and intense peritumoral immune response in MSI-H carcinomas. Some of these differences were confirmed by semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR and immunohistochemical analysis. Our findings indicate that there are many different genetic and transcriptomic characteristics between MSI-H and MSS colorectal carcinomas, and some of these differently expressed genes can be used as diagnostic or prognostic markers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据