4.5 Article

Involvement of RhoA and possible neuroprotective effect of fasudil, a Rho kinase inhibitor, in NMDA-induced neurotoxicity in the rat retina

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1018, 期 1, 页码 111-118

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2004.05.070

关键词

fasudil; RhoA; Rho kinase inhibitor; N-methyl-D-aspartate; retina; Thy-1 mRNA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

RhoA, a key protein involved in cytoskeleton regulation modulating neurogenesis and neural plasticity, has been implicated in a variety of cellular functions including the modulation of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor activity. We examined its possible involvement in NMDA-induced excitotoxicity in the retina, and evaluated the neuroprotective effect of fasudil, a Rho kinase inhibitor, in this model of neurotoxicity. RhoA protein levels in NMDA-treated retinas were assessed by Western blot analysis and localized by immunohistochemistry. Fasudil (10(-6)-10(-)4 M together with 4 x 10(-2) M NMDA) was given intravitreally and its effect was evaluated by counting the number of cells in the ganglion cell layer (GCL), measuring the thickness of the inner plexiform layer (IPL), and measuring retinal Thy-1 mRNA levels at 5 days after injection. Western blot analysis showed a transient increase in the level of retinal RhoA and ROCKII proteins at I day after NMDA injection, and that this increment was significantly prevented by simultaneous injection of fasudil. Immunohistochemistry showed that NMDA induced a substantial increase in RhoA immunoreactivity in the GCL and the IPL. Fasudil injection reduced cell loss in the GCL and the reduction in IPL thickness after NMDA injection. The reduction in Thy-1 mRNA levels by NMDA was also significantly attenuated by concomitant injection of fasudil. These results suggest that RhoA and ROCKII are upregulated and may be involved in NMDA-induced retinal neurotoxicity, and that fasudil is neuroprotective against glutamate-related excitotoxicity. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据