4.7 Article

The Oxford-Dartmouth Thirty Degree Survey - I. Observations and calibration of a wide-field multiband survey

期刊

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08014.x

关键词

catalogues; surveys; galaxies : general; cosmology : observations; large-scale structure of Universe

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Oxford-Dartmouth Thirty Degree Survey (ODTS) is a deep, wide, multiband imaging survey designed to cover a total of 30 deg(2) in BV Ri'Z, with a subset of U- and K-band data, in four separate fields of 5-10 deg(2) centred at 00:18:24 + 34:52, 09:09:45 + 40:50, 13:40:00 +02:30 and 16:39:30 +45:24. Observations have been made using the Wide Field Camera on the 2.5-m Isaac Newton Telescope (INT) in La Palma to average limiting depths (5sigma Vega, aperture magnitudes) of U = 24.8, B = 25.6, V = 25.0, R = 24.6 and i' = 23.5, with observations taken in ideal conditions reaching the target depths of U = 25.3, B = 26.2, V = 25.7, R = 25.4 and i' = 24.6. The INT Z-band data were found to be severely effected by fringing and, consequently, are now being obtained at the MDM observatory in Arizona. A complementary K-band survey has also been carried out at MDM, reaching an average depth of K 5 approximate to18.5. At present, approximately 23 deg(2) of the ODTS have been observed, with 3.5 deg(2) of the K- band survey completed. This paper details the survey goals, field selection, observation strategy and data reduction procedure, focusing on the photometric calibration and catalogue construction. Preliminary photometric redshifts have been obtained for a subsample of the objects with R less than or equal to 23. These results are presented alongside a brief description of the photometric redshift determination technique used. The median redshift of the survey is estimated to be z approximate to 0.7 from a combination of the ODTS photometric redshifts and comparison with the redshift distributions of other surveys. Finally, galaxy number counts for the ODTS are presented which are found to be in excellent agreement with previous studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据