4.7 Article

Simultaneous-fault detection based on qualitative symptom descriptions for automotive engine diagnosis

期刊

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
卷 22, 期 -, 页码 238-248

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.05.014

关键词

Simultaneous-fault diagnosis; Fuzzy logic; Probabilistic classification; Decision threshold optimization; Automotive engine diagnosis

资金

  1. FDCT Macau SAR [FDCT/075/2013/A]
  2. University of Macau [MYRG075(Y2-L2)-FST12-VCM, MYRG075(Y1-L2)-FST13-VCM, MYRG2014-00178-FST]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Practical automotive engine fault diagnosis in an automotive service center is usually performed by analyzing the qualitative symptom descriptions provided by the vehicle owner. However, it is a non-trivial and time-consuming procedure because; (i) the qualitative symptom descriptions are usually collected through a questionnaire containing binary, numerical, and vague data that are difficult to digest; (ii) the engine malfunctioning may not be caused by a single-fault only, but several single-faults simultaneously (i.e., simultaneous-faults). Therefore, automotive mechanic usually requires several days or even weeks to diagnose and fix the engine. To improve this non-trivial and time-consuming procedure of engine fault diagnosis for the mechanic, a new framework of simultaneous-fault diagnosis is proposed in this paper by integrating fuzzification, pairwise probabilistic multi-label classification, and decision-by-threshold. This framework is called fuzzy and probabilistic simultaneous-fault diagnosis (FPSD). Compared to traditional frameworks, FPSD requires much fewer training cases of costly simultaneous-faults while it can probabilistically diagnose both unseen single-faults and simultaneous-faults based on qualitative symptom descriptions. To evaluate the performance of FPSD, a comparative study was conducted over common classification techniques. Experimental results show that the proposed framework can effectively alleviate the aforementioned issues. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据