4.7 Article

A new MCDM method combining QFD with TOPSIS for knowledge management system selection from the user's perspective in intuitionistic fuzzy environment

期刊

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
卷 21, 期 -, 页码 28-37

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.03.008

关键词

Multiple criteria decision making; Knowledge management system selection; Quality function deployment; TOPSIS

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71101153, 71271018]
  2. Humanity and Social Science Youth Foundation of Ministry of Education in China [10YJC630104, 13YJC790112]
  3. [QD-2010-06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Knowledge management system (KMS) is crucial for organization knowledge management. In order to help the evaluation and selection of KMS from the user's perspective, a new multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) method combining quality function deployment (QFD) with technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) in intuitionistic fuzzy environment is proposed. In the method, the customer criteria and system criteria for KMS selection are required. These two kinds of criteria are established from the user's perspective and the designer's perspective respectively. Customers give their linguistic opinions about the importance of the customer criteria and the rating of alternatives with respect to the customer criterion. Analysts give their linguistic opinions about the relationship between the customer criteria and the system criteria, and the correlation between the system criteria. After the aggregation of linguistic opinions in intuitionistic fuzzy environment, the customers' opinions are transformed into the rating of the weight of system criteria and rating of the alternatives concerning the system criteria by the QFD. Afterwards the alternatives are ranked according to system criteria by TOPSIS method in intuitionistic fuzzy environment and the best alternative is determined. In the end an example is provided to illustrate the applicability of the proposed method. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据