4.0 Article

A novel specific prophylaxis for menstrual-associated migraine

期刊

SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL
卷 97, 期 9, 页码 819-822

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.SMJ.0000129924.15619.D9

关键词

estrogen; hormone therapy; menstrual migraine; prophylaxis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Few migraine prophylactic therapies have demonstrated a 50% reduction in headaches. Even when successful, the economic burden of prophylaxis can discourage widespread usage. This article presents a pilot study of a novel, effective, specific, and inexpensive prophylactic strategy for menstrual-associated migraine. Materials and Methods: Eleven women with menstrual-associated migraine and fewer than 14 days of headache per month were identified from prospective enrollment at a gynecology practice and retrospective chart review at a headache center. Exclusion criteria included current use of prophylactic therapy for migraine. Methods: Patients received open-label therapy with an oral contraceptive containing 20 mug ethinyl estradiol on days 1 to 21, supplemented with 0.9 mg conjugated equine estrogens on days 22 to 28. Headache intensity and bleeding were recorded in diaries that plotted headache days by oral contraceptive pill days. Results: All of the patients achieved at least a 50% reduction in number of headache days per cycle (mean 77.9% reduction); 10 of the 11 women achieved at least a 50% reduction in weighted headache score (mean 76.3% reduction). Conclusions: All currently available estrogen-containing oral contraceptives produce a premenstrual fall in ethinyl estradiol concentration equal to or greater than 20 mug. Estrogen supplementation during the placebo week can reduce the magnitude of this fall to less than 20 mug. When the decline is limited to the equivalent of 10 mug ethinyl estradiol, menstrual-associated migraine is prevented. At an average cost of six dollars per headache-day prevented, this represents an effective and inexpensive strategy for a common migraine trigger.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据