4.6 Article

Iron oxide nanoparticles as magnetic resonance contrast agent for tumor imaging via folate receptor-targeted delivery

期刊

ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 996-1004

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2004.04.018

关键词

superparamagnetic iron oxide; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); folate targeting; tumor imaging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale and Objective. Targeted delivery is a highly desirable strategy for diagnostic imaging because of enhanced efficacy and reduced dosage/toxicity. Receptor-targeting was used to deliver contrast-producing superparamagnetic iron oxide (IO) nanoparticle to receptor-expressing tumors for in vivo magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Materials and Methods. Nanometer- sized, dextran-coated (maghemite) IO particles were prepared by a precipitation method. They were tethered with N-hydroxysuccinimide-folate and fluorescence isothiocyanate (FITC). For in vitro study of delivery specificity and efficiency, KB cells, a human nasopharyngeal epidermal carcinoma cell line expressing surface receptors for folic acid, were used as positive targets, and A549 cells, a human lung carcinoma cell line which lacks folate receptors, were used as negative control targets. In vivo MR images were obtained using mouse models with subcutaneous tumor xenografts grown from implanted KB cells. Results. Internalization of nanoparticles into targeted cells only occurred when IO was conjugated to folate and when the folate receptors are available and accessible on the cells. The endocytosis was efficient and rapid, as 97.5% KB cells cultured with folate-FITC-IO showed FIX uptake after 1 hour of incubation. In in vivo MR imaging, an average intensity decrease of 38% was observed from precontrast to postcontrast images of the tumor, which was about three times the intensity decrease observed at a non-tumor-bearing muscle. Conclusion. Successful in vivo MR imaging of folate receptor-expressing, tumors targeted by 10 nanoparticles was demonstrated for the first time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据