4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Properties of lignin-polyurethane films prepared by casting method

期刊

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 231-241

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2004.04.024

关键词

lignin; polyurethane; blends; films; mechanical properties; thermal degradation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A polyurethane elastomer made from a 1:5:6 mole ratio of poly(ethyleneadipate), ethylene glycol, and 4,4'-diphenylmethaned-iisocyanate was blended with flax soda lignin to form dimethylformamide-cast films containing between 4.2 and 23.2 wt.% lignin. The spectral, mechanical and thermal properties of this new type of blends were investigated in an attempt to establish their applicative potential. Films containing more than 9.3 wt.% lignin were heterogeneous, without relevance from the standpoint of potential applications, and were not tested for mechanical or thermal stability properties. The thermal degradation range of polyurethane and blends is quite similar, but the presence of lignin accelerates decomposition at lower temperatures. At 4.2 wt.% lignin, blends lost almost one half more weight until 300degreesC, and almost twice at 9.3 wt.% lignin than pure polyurethane. The presence of 9.3 wt.% lignin also lowers the main degradation intensity corresponding to the polyurethane soft segment with about 120degreesC (from 360 to 235-245degreesC). The lignin concentration and polyurethane soft segment properties were shown to be the key degradation factors. The tensile strength increased up to 370%, toughness up to 470% and elongation at break up to 160% at blends compared to the pure polyurethane film. By increasing the strain rate from 4.6 to 120 mm/min the blends behavior generally improves, whereas the polyurethane elastomer is detrimental affected. Lignin contents up to about 10 wt.% were adequate to increase the polyurethane strength in detriment of elasticity. However, the better thermo-mechanical properties were found for the 4.2 wt.% lignin-containing blend. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据