4.8 Article

Compositions and sorptive properties of crop residue-derived chars

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 38, 期 17, 页码 4649-4655

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es035034w

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chars originating from the burning or pyrolysis of vegetation may significantly sorb neutral organic contaminants (NOCs). To evaluate the relationship between the char composition and NOC sorption, a series of char samples were generated by pyrolyzing a wheat residue (Triticum aestivum L.) for 6 h at temperatures between 300 degreesC and 700 degreesC and analyzed for their elemental compositions, surface areas, and surface functional groups. The samples were then studied for their abilities to sorb benzene and nitrobenzene from water. A commercial activated carbon was used as a reference carbonaceous sample. The char samples produced at high pyrolytic temperatures (500-700 degreesC) were well carbonized and exhibited a relatively high surface area (>300 m(2)/g), little organic matter (<3%), and low oxygen content (less than or equal to10%). By contrast, the chars formed at low temperatures (300-400 degreesC) were only partially carbonized, showing significantly different properties (<200 m(2)/g surface area, 40-50% organic carbon, and >20% oxygen). The char samples exhibited a significant range of surface acidity/basicity because of their different surface polar-group contents, as characterized by the Boehm titration data and the NMR and FIR spectra. The NOC sorption by high-temperature chars occurred almost exclusively by surface adsorption on carbonized surfaces, whereas the sorption by low-temperature chars resulted from the surface adsorption and the concurrent smaller partition into the residual organic-matter phase. The chars appeared to have a higher surface affinity for a polar solute (nitrobenzene) than for a nonpolar solute (benzene), the difference being related to the surface acidity/basicity of the char samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据