4.7 Article

Effect of intravenous infusion of exenatide (synthetic exendin-4) on glucose-dependent insulin secretion and counterregulation during hypoglycemia

期刊

DIABETES
卷 53, 期 9, 页码 2397-2403

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diabetes.53.9.2397

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed whether glucose-dependent insulin secretion and overall counterregulatory response are preserved during hypoglycemia in the presence of exenatide. Twelve healthy fasted volunteers were randomized in a triple-blind crossover study to receive either intravenous exenatide (0.066 pmol.kg(-1).min(-1)) or placebo during a 270-min stepwise hyperinsulinemic-hypoglycemic clamp (insulin infusion 0.8 mU.kg(-1).min(-1)). Plasma glucose was clamped sequentially at 5.0 (0-120 min), 4.0 (120-180 min), 3.2 (180-240 min), and 2.7 mmol/l (240-270 min). At 270 min, insulin infusion was terminated and plasma glucose increased to similar to3.2 mmol/l. The time to achieve plasma glucose greater than or equal to4 mmol/l thereafter was recorded. Insulin secretory rates (ISRs) and counterregulatory hormones were measured throughout. Glucose profiles were superimposable between the exenatide and placebo arms. In the presence of euglycemic hyperinsulinemia, ISRs in the exenatide arm were similar to3.5-fold higher than in the placebo arm (353+/-29 vs. 100+/-29 pmol/min [least-square means +/- SE]). However, ISRs declined similarly and rapidly at all hypoglycemic steps (less than or equal to4 mmol/l) in both groups. Glucagon was suppressed in the exenatide arm during euglycemia and higher than placebo during hypoglycemia. Plasma glucose recovery time was equivalent for both treatments. The areas under the concentration-time curve from 270 to 360 min for cortisol, epinephrine, norepinephrine, and growth hormone were similar between treatment arms. There were no differences in adverse events. In the presence of exenatide, there was a preserved, glucose-dependent insulin secretory response and counterregulatory response during hypoglycemia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据