4.5 Article

Protein kinase Cδ regulates keratinocyte death and survival by regulating activity and subcellular localization of a p38δ-extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 complex

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
卷 24, 期 18, 页码 8167-8183

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.24.18.8167-8183.2004

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30CA43703, P30 CA043703] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR39750, P30 AR039750] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protein kinase Cdelta (PKCdelta) is an important regulator of apoptosis in epidermal keratinocytes. However, little information is available regarding the downstream kinases that mediate PKCdelta-dependent keratinocyte death. This study implicates p38delta mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) as a downstream carrier of the PKCdelta-dependent death signal. We show that coexpression of PKCdelta with p38delta produces profound apoptosis-like morphological changes. These morphological changes are associated with increased sub-G, cell population, cytochrome c release, loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, caspase activation, and PARP cleavage. This death response is specific for the combination of PKCdelta and p38delta and is not produced by replacing PKCdelta with PKCalpha or p38delta with p38alpha. A constitutively active form of MEK6, an upstream activator of p38delta, can also produce cell death when coupled with p38delta. In addition, concurrent p38delta activation and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) inactivation are required for apoptosis. Regarding this inverse regulation, we describe a p38delta-ERK1/2 complex that may coordinate these changes in activity. We further show that this p38delta-ERK1/2 complex relocates into the nucleus in response to PKCdelta expression. This regulation appears to be physiological, since H2O2, a known inducer of keratinocyte apoptosis, promotes identical PKCS and p38delta-ERK1/2 activity changes, leading to similar morphological changes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据