4.4 Article

Effects of Tree Harvest on the Stable-State Dynamics of Savanna and Forest

期刊

AMERICAN NATURALIST
卷 185, 期 5, 页码 E153-E165

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/680475

关键词

alternative stable states; savanna; forest; tree harvest; fire; fuelwood

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-1139096]
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration Headquarters under the Earth and Space Science Fellowship Program [NNX11AL43H]
  3. James E. Ellis Memorial Scholarship
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Division Of Environmental Biology [1139096] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Contemporary theory on the maintenance and stability of the savanna biome has focused extensively on how climate and disturbances interact to affect tree growth and demography. In particular, the role of fire in reducing tree cover from climatic maxima is now well appreciated, and in certain cases, herbivory also strongly affects tree cover. However, in African savannas and forests, harvest of trees by humans for cooking and heating is an oft overlooked disturbance. Thus, we incorporate tree harvest into a population dynamic model of grasses, savanna saplings, savanna trees, and forest trees. We use assumptions about the differential demographic responses of savanna trees and forest trees to harvest to show how tree harvest influences tree cover, demography, and community composition. Tree harvest can erode the intrinsic basin of attraction for forest and make a state transition via fire to savanna more likely. The savanna state is generally resilient to all but high levels of tree harvest because of the resprouting abilities of savanna trees. In the absence of active fire suppression, our analysis suggests that we can expect to see large and potentially irreversible shifts from forest to savanna as demand increases for charcoal in sub-Saharan Africa. On the other hand, savanna tree species' traits promote savanna stability in the face of low to moderate harvest pressure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据