4.7 Article

Determination of Hg from Cu concentrates by X-ray fluorescence through preconcentration on polyurethane foam

期刊

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 78, 期 1, 页码 1-5

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2004.02.015

关键词

mercury; copper concentrate; polyurethane foam; X-ray fluorescence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A methodology was developed for the separation and determination of microamounts of mercury from copper concentrate samples by wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence (WDXRF) after solid-phase extraction of mercury from iodide medium using polyurethane foam (PUF). The best sorption conditions for the Hg-KI-PUF system were settled using X-ray fluorescence technique after collection of ground PUF on a filter paper by vacuum filtration and direct measurement of the intensity signal of the sorbed mercury on PUF. The main parameters of sorption such as iodide concentration, pH, shaking time and sample dilution effect were studied. The system shows rapid kinetic sorption and maximum X-ray intensity signal was achieved after shaking for 2 min a 0.01 mol l(-1) iodide solution containing microamounts of mercury in the pH range from 1.0 to 9.0. Effective sorption up to a volume of 0.91 allows preconcentration of mercury. A linear fit up to 50 mug mercury was obtained by the plot of the initial mercury mass in the bulk solution (0.5 1) vs. its respective XRF intensity signal measurement on ground PUF after the sorption process. The calibration sensitivity, quantification and detection limits found were 9.09 CPS mug(-1), 9.0 and 2.7 mug, respectively. The sorption of many elements was also evaluated under the best conditions. High concentrations of Cu(II) and Fe(III) interfere seriously. Mercury-selective separation could be achieved using citrate or EDTA as masking agent; no interference due to copper matrix samples was observed in citrate medium. This methodology was evaluated by recovery for mercury determination in copper concentrate ore samples supplied by a mining industry and copper sulfate salts; the results were between 98% and 106%. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据