4.6 Article

Stripe order, depinning, and fluctuations in La1.875Ba0.125CuO4 and La1.875Ba0.075Sr0.050CuO4 -: art. no. 104517

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 70, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.104517

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a neutron scattering study of stripe correlations measured on a single crystal of La1.875Ba0.125CuO4. Within the low-temperature-tetragonal (LTT) phase, superlattice peaks indicative of spin and charge stripe order are observed below 50 K. For excitation energies (h) over bar omegaless than or equal to12 meV, we have characterized the magnetic excitations that emerge from the incommensurate magnetic superlattice peaks. In the ordered state, these excitations are similar to spin waves. Following these excitations as a function of temperature, we find that there is relatively little change in the Q-integrated dynamical spin susceptibility for (h) over bar omegasimilar to10 meV as stripe order disappears and then as the structure transforms from LTT to the low-temperature-orthorhombic phase. The Q-integrated signal at lower energies changes more dramatically through these transitions, as it must in a transformation from an ordered to a disordered state. We argue that the continuous evolution through the transitions provides direct evidence that the incommensurate spin excitations in the disordered state are an indicator of dynamical charge stripes. An interesting feature of the thermal evolution is a variation in the incommensurability of the magnetic scattering. Similar behavior is observed in measurements on a single crystal of La1.875Ba0.075Sr0.050CuO4; maps of the scattered intensity in a region centered on the antiferromagnetic wave vector and measured at (h) over bar omega=4 meV are well reproduced by a model of disordered stripes with a temperature-dependent mixture of stripe spacings. We discuss the relevance of our results to understanding the magnetic excitations in cuprate superconductors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据