4.4 Article

Poloxamer 188 prevents acute necrosis of adult skeletal muscle cells following high-dose irradiation

期刊

BURNS
卷 30, 期 6, 页码 539-547

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2004.02.009

关键词

post-mitotic cells; ionizing radiation; necrosis; poloxamer; membrane sealing

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01-GM53113] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acute cellular necrosis occurring minutes to hours after massive ionizing radiation exposure (IR) results from rapid membrane lipid peroxidation, blebbing and membrane breakdown. We have shown, previously, that certain polymer surfactants can restore structural integrity and transport barrier function of cell membranes following high-dose IR. We now investigate, specifically, the efficacy of the amphiphilic surfactant Poloxamer 188 (P188) in preventing acute necrosis of adult rat skeletal muscle cells after high-dose IR. Explanted cells were treated with Co-60 IR doses of 10, 40 or 80 Gy and their viability was determined using fluorometric probes at 4 and 18 h post-IR. IR of 10 Gy did not cause acute necrosis. Significant acute cell necrosis was observed after 40 and 80 Gy doses in a dose-dependent manner. Post-IR treatment with P188 significantly enhanced the cells' viability post-IR treatment. By comparison 10 kDa neutral dextran, a hydrophilic polymer, was found to be ineffective. Despite progressive cell death over 18 h after high-dose IR, cells treated with P188 manifested greater survival than media or dextran-treated cells. It appears that use of P188 or similar multi-block copolymers to prolong viability of irradiated cells in vitro through membrane sealing is an important step in development of effective interventional therapy for extreme IR exposure. Not only can repairing the membrane prevent acute necrosis, but it also can provide a critical time opportunity to address other mechanisms of cell death, such as apoptosis or mitotic arrest, which manifest over a longer time frame. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据