4.5 Article

In vivo measurement and imaging of tumor oxygenation using coembedded paramagnetic particulates

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 52, 期 3, 页码 650-657

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20188

关键词

EPR imaging; oximetry; LiPc; RIF-1 tumor; hypoxia

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA 78886] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tumor tissue oxygenation is an important parameter that is positively correlated to the chemo- or radiation treatment outcome of certain tumors. Hence, methods to accurately and noninvasively determine the concentration of oxygen (pO(2)) in tumors will be valuable. In this study, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy, utilizing microcrystalline particulates of lithium phthalocyanine (LiPc), was used to perform repeated measurements of pO(2) as a function of tumor growth. We permanently embedded the particulates in the tumor by coimplanting them with RIF-1 tumor cells during inoculation in mice. This procedure enabled repeated measurements of oxygen concentration in the tumor to be obtained for >2 weeks during its growth phase. The particulates were stable and nontoxic to the tumor cells. Both an in vitro clonogenic assay and an in vivo tumor growth rate examination in C3H mice showed no apparent effect on cell proliferation or tumor growth rate. The measurements indicated that the pO(2) of the tumor decreased exponentially with tumor growth and reached hypoxic levels (similar to4 mmHg) within 4 days after inoculation of the tumor cells. Spatial EPR imaging revealed a nonuniform distribution of the embedded particulates, which were localized mainly in the middle of the tumor volume. Oxygen mapping of the tumor, obtained by spectroscopic EPR imaging, showed significant variation of pO(2) within the tumor. In summary, EPR spectroscopy and imaging with an embedded oximetry probe enabled accurate and repeated measurements of pO(2) to be obtained in growing tumors under nonperturbing conditions. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据