4.5 Article

Downhill running a model of exercise hyperemia in the rat spinotrapezius muscle

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 97, 期 3, 页码 1138-1142

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00334.2004

关键词

skeletal muscle; blood flow; microvascular adaptation

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-50306, HL-69739] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [AG-19228] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To utilize the rat spinotrapezius muscle as a model to investigate the microcirculatory consequences of exercise training, it is necessary to design an exercise protocol that recruits this muscle. There is evidence that the spinotrapezius is derecruited during standard treadmill exercise protocols performed on the uphill treadmill (i.e., 6degrees incline). This investigation tested the hypothesis that downhill running would effectively recruit the spinotrapezius muscle as assessed by the presence of an exercise hyperemia response. We used radioactive 15-mum microspheres to determine blood flows in the spinotrapezius and selected hindlimb muscles of female Sprague-Dawley rats at rest and during downhill (i.e., - 14degrees incline; 331 +/- 5 g body wt, n = 7) and level ( i.e., 0degrees incline; 320 +/- 11 g body wt, n = 5) running at 30 m/min. Both level and downhill exercise increased blood flow to all hindlimb muscles ( P < 0.01). However, in marked contrast to the absence of a hyperemic response to level running, blood flow to the spinotrapezius muscle increased from 26 +/- 6 ml center dot min(-1) center dot 100 g(-1) at rest to 69 +/- 8 ml center dot min(-1) center dot 100 g(-1) during downhill running ( P < 0.01). These findings indicate that downhill running represents an exercise paradigm that recruits the spinotrapezius muscle and thereby constitutes a tenable physiological model for investigating the adaptations induced by exercise training (i.e., the mechanisms of altered microcirculatory control by transmission light microscopy).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据