4.4 Article

The contribution of metal ions to the structural stability of the large ribosomal subunit

期刊

RNA
卷 10, 期 9, 页码 1366-1379

出版社

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1261/rna.7390804

关键词

RNA structure; ribosome structure; metal ion; coordination; magnesium; monovalent cation

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM22778, P01 GM022778] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Both monovalent cations and magnesium ions are well known to be essential for the folding and stability of large RNA molecules that form complex and compact structures. In the atomic structure of the large ribosomal subunit from Haloarcula marismortui, we have identified 116 magnesium ions and 88 monovalent cations bound principally to rRNA. Although the rRNA structures to which these metal ions bind are highly idiosyncratic, a few common principles have emerged from the identities of the specific functional groups that coordinate them. The nonbridging oxygen of a phosphate group is the most common inner shell ligand of Mg++, and Mg++ ions having one or two such inner shell ligands are very common. Nonbridging phosphate oxygens and the heteroatoms of nucleotide bases are common outer shell ligands for Mg++ ions. Monovalent cations usually interact with nucleotide bases and protein groups, although some interactions with nonbridging phosphate oxygens are found. The most common monovalent cation binding site is the major groove side of G-U wobble pairs. Both divalent and monovalent cations stabilize the tertiary structure of 23S rRNA by mediating interactions between its structural domains. Bound metal ions are particularly abundant in the region surrounding the peptidyl transferase center, where stabilizing cationic tails of ribosomal proteins are notably absent. This may point to the importance of metal ions for the stabilization of specific RNA structures in the evolutionary period prior to the appearance of proteins, and hence many of these metal ion binding sites may be conserved across all phylogenetic kingdoms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据