4.5 Article

CCAAT/enhancer binding protein δ (C/EBPδ) expression and elevation in Alzheimer's disease

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 25, 期 8, 页码 991-999

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2003.10.016

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; inflammation; transcription factors; CCAAT enhancer; binding protein (C/EBP); astrocyte; cytokine

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG07367] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The CCAAT-enhancer binding protein (C/EBP) family of transcription factors, particularly C/EBPdelta, is well known to regulate or co-regulate a wide range of inflammatory mediators and mechanisms in the periphery, including interleukin-1 (IL-1),interleukin-6(IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). These cytokines, in turn, can induce C/EBPdelta expression and translocation to the nucleus as an active transcription factor. Because IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-alpha are increased in pathologically vulnerable regions of the Alzheimer's disease (AD) brain, we sought to determine if C/EBPdelta might be expressed in AD cortex. Immunohistochemistry of AD tissue sections revealed profuse C/EBPdelta staining of astrocytes, particularly reactive astrocytes surrounding amyloid beta peptide deposits. Substantially less immunoreactivity was observed in comparable sections from nondemented elderly control (ND) patients. These qualitative findings were consistent with quantitative Western blot densitometry results showing significant increases in C/EBPdelta in AD compared to ND cortex samples. Additional in vitro studies were pursued in order to characterize functional activity of C/EBPdelta in human elderly astrocytes. Consistent with a functionally active transcription factor, C/EBPdelta immunoreactivity predominated in the nucleus of cultured AD and ND astrocytes, and exhibited increases and nuclear localization, as determined by Western blots and electrophoretic mobility shifts after exposure to C/EBPdelta-inducing cytokines. (C) 2004 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据