4.7 Article

Constraining the lifetime of circumstellar disks in the terrestrial planet zone: A mid-infrared survey of the 30 Myr old Tucana-Horologium association

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 612, 期 1, 页码 496-510

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/422550

关键词

circumstellar matter; infrared : stars; open clusters and associations : individual (Horologium, Tucana); planetary systems : formation; planetary systems : protoplanetary disks

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have conducted an N-band survey of 14 young stars in the similar to30 Myr old Tucana-Horologium association to search for evidence of warm, circumstellar dust disks. Using the MIRAC-BLINC camera on the Magellan I (Baade) 6.5 m telescope, we find that none of the stars have a statistically significant N-band excess compared to the predicted stellar photospheric flux. Using three different sets of assumptions, this null result rules out the existence of the following around these post-T Tauri stars: (1) optically thick disks with inner hole radii of less than or similar to0.1 AU, (2) optically thin disks with masses of less than 10(-6) M-circle plus (in similar to1 mum sized grains) within less than or similar to10 AU of these stars, and (3) scaled-up analogs of the solar system zodiacal dust cloud with more than 4000 times the emitting area. Our survey was sensitive to dust disks in the terrestrial planet zone with fractional luminosity of log (L-dust/L-*)similar to10(-2.9), yet none were found. Combined with results from previous surveys, these data suggest that circumstellar dust disks become so optically thin as to be undetectable at N band before age similar to20 Myr. We also present N-band photometry for several members of other young associations and a subsample of targets that will be observed with the Spitzer Space Telescope by the Formation and Evolution of Planetary Systems Legacy Science Program. Finally, we present an absolute calibration of MIRAC-BLINC for four filters (L, N, 11.6, and Q(s)) on the Cohen-Walker-Witteborn system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据