4.5 Article

Exercise training decreases gene expression of endo- and xeno-sensors in rat small intestine

期刊

APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY NUTRITION AND METABOLISM
卷 39, 期 10, 页码 1098-1103

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING, NRC RESEARCH PRESS
DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2013-0573

关键词

ileum; OST alpha/beta; ABCG5/G8; NPC1L1; ABCA1; nuclear receptors

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [7594]
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. (CIHR) [T 0602 145.02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of the study was to test the hypothesis that gene expression of members of the nuclear receptor (NR) superfamily known to act as endo-and xeno-sensors is reduced in the ileum of exercise-trained (Tr) rats. Healthy female rats were either treadmill-trained for 8 weeks, 5 times/week, or remained sedentary (Sed). Training resulted in a significant (p < 0.05) decrease in plasma free fatty acid (0.18 +/- 0.01 to 0.15 +/- 0.01 mmol/L) and glycerol (24.8 +/- 0.8 to 18.7 +/- 0.8 mg/L) concentrations. Gene expressions of NRs farnesoid X receptor (FXR; p < 0.05), liver X receptor (LXR; p < 0.05), pregnane X receptor (PXR; p < 0.01), and retinoid X receptor (RXR; p < 0.06) were reduced in the ileum of Tr compared with Sed animals. Tr was also associated with a reduction (p < 0.05) in gene expression of FXR downstream heterodimeric organite solute transporters alpha (OST alpha) and beta (OST beta) involved in the transport of bile acids, LXR downstream genes heterodimeric ATP-binding cassette transporters (ABCG5/G8) involved in transport of absorbed cholesterol back to the lumen, and Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 (NPC1L1) involved in cholesterol absorption. These data indicate that exercise training lowers the expression of molecules involved in the defense system of the ileum against endobiotic and xenobiotic insults under normal conditions, thus, suggesting that regular exercise contributes to the intestinal maintenance of cholesterol and bile acid homeostasis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据