4.5 Article

N-acetylcysteine alters substrate metabolism during high-intensity cycle exercise in well-trained humans

期刊

APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY NUTRITION AND METABOLISM
卷 38, 期 12, 页码 1217-1227

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING, NRC RESEARCH PRESS
DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2012-0482

关键词

substrate oxidation; reactive oxygen species; antioxidants; performance; time trial

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the effects of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) on metabolism during fixed work rate high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) and self-paced 10-min time-trial (TT10) performance. Nine well-trained male cyclists ((V) over dotO(2peak), 69.4 +/- 5.8 mL.kg(-1).min(-1); peak power output (PPO), 385 +/- 43 W; mean +/- SD) participated in a double-blind, repeated-measures, randomised crossover trial. Two trials (NAC supplementation and placebo) were performed 7 days apart consisting of 6 x 5 min HIIE bouts at 82% PPO (316 +/- 40 W) separated by 1 min at 100 W, and then after 2 min of recovery at 100 W, TT10 was performed. Expired gases, venous blood, and electromyographic (EMG) data were collected. NAC did not influence blood glutathione but decreased lipid peroxidation compared with the placebo (P < 0.05). Fat oxidation was elevated with NAC compared with the placebo during HIIE bouts 5 and 6 (9.9 +/- 8.9 vs. 3.9 +/- 4.8 mu mol.kg(-1).min(-1); P < 0.05), as was blood glucose throughout HIIE (4.3 +/- 0.6 vs. 3.8 +/- 0.6 mmol.L-1; P < 0.05). Blood lactate was lower with NAC after TT10 (3.3 +/- 1.3 vs. 4.2 +/- 1.3 mmol.L-1; P < 0.05). Median EMG frequency of the vastus lateralis was lower with NAC during HIIE (79 +/- 10 vs. 85 +/- 10 Hz; P < 0.05), but not TT10 (82 +/- 11 Hz). Finally, NAC decreased mean power output 4.9% +/- 6.6% (effect size = -0.3 +/- 0.4, mean +/- 90% CI) during TT10 (305 +/- 57 W vs. 319 +/- 45 W). These data suggest that NAC alters substrate metabolism and muscle fibre type recruitment during HIIE, which is detrimental to time-trial performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据