4.5 Article

Oxygen consumption, substrate oxidation, and blood pressure following sprint interval exercise

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING, NRC RESEARCH PRESS
DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2012-0136

关键词

sprint exercise; metabolism; blood pressure; fat oxidation

资金

  1. Nanyang Technological University under Undergraduate Research Experience on CAmpus (URECA) programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the acute effect of sprint interval exercise (SIE) on postexercise oxygen consumption, substrate oxidation, and blood pressure. The participants were 10 healthy males aged 21-27 years. Following overnight fasts, each participant undertook 2 trials in a random balanced order: (i) four 30-s bouts of SIE on a cycle ergometer, separated by 4.5 min of recovery, and (ii) resting (control) in the laboratory for an equivalent period. Time-matched measurements of oxygen consumption, respiratory exchange ratio, and blood pressure were made for 2 h into recovery. Total 2-h oxygen consumption was significantly higher in the SIE than in the control trial (mean +/- SD: Control: 31.9 +/- 6.7 L vs Exercise: 45.5 +/- 6.8 L, p < 0.001). The rate of fat oxidation was 75% higher 2 h after the exercise trial compared with the control trial (Control: 0.08 +/- 0.05 g.min(-1) vs Exercise: 0.14 +/- 0.06 g.min(-1), p = 0.035). Systolic blood pressure (Control: 117 +/- 8 mmHg vs Exercise: 109 +/- 8 mmHg, p < 0.05) and diastolic blood pressure (Control: 84 +/- 6 mm Hg vs Exercise: 77 +/- 5 mm Hg, p < 0.05) were significantly lower 2 h after the exercise trial compared with the control trial. These data showed a 42% increase in oxygen consumption (similar to 13.6 L) over 2 h after a single bout of SIE. Moreover, the rate of fat oxidation increased by 75%, whereas blood pressure was reduced by similar to 8 mm Hg 2 h after SIE. Whether these acute benefits of SIE can translate into long-term changes in body composition and an improvement in vascular health needs investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据