4.5 Article

Tissue-specific sex differences in docosahexaenoic acid and Δ6-desaturase in rats fed a standard chow diet

期刊

APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY NUTRITION AND METABOLISM
卷 37, 期 6, 页码 1200-1211

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING, NRC RESEARCH PRESS
DOI: 10.1139/h2012-103

关键词

alpha-linolenic acid; ALA; docosahexaenoic acid; DHA; Delta 6-desaturase; liver; sex differences; PUFA; male; female

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Government of Ontario
  3. Ontario Foundation for Innovation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6n-3) is higher in the blood and tissues of females relative to males, but the underlying mechanism is not clear. The present study examined the expression of enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of DHA from short-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in male and female rats (n = 6 for each sex). Rats were maintained on an AIN-93G diet and sacrificed at 14 weeks of age after an overnight fast. Plasma, erythrocytes, liver, heart, and brain were collected for fatty acid composition analysis and the determination of enzyme and transcription factor expression by RT-PCR and immunoblotting. Females had higher DHA concentrations in the total lipids of liver, plasma, erythrocyte, and heart (53%, 75%, 36%, and 25% higher, respectively, compared with males) with no sex differences in brain DHA concentrations. The mRNA content of Delta 5-desaturase, Delta 6-desaturase, and elongase 2 was 1.0-, 1.4-, and 1.1-fold higher, respectively, in the livers of female rats compared with males, with no differences in the hearts or brains. The protein content of Delta 6-desaturase was also higher in females. Higher hepatic mRNA of sterol-regulatory element-binding protein 1-c and estrogen receptor alpha in the females suggests that lipogenic and estrogen signaling mechanisms are involved. The sex difference in DHA concentration is tissue specific and is associated with higher Delta 6-desaturase expression in females relative to males, which appears to be limited to the liver.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据