4.5 Article

Two maximal isometric contractions attenuate the magnitude of eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage

期刊

APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY NUTRITION AND METABOLISM
卷 37, 期 4, 页码 680-689

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/H2012-035

关键词

protective effect; muscle strength; delayed onset muscle soreness; creatine kinase; elbow flexors; lengthening contractions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated whether maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVC-ISO) would attenuate the magnitude of eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage. Young untrained men were placed into one of the two experimental groups or one control group (n = 13 per group). Subjects in the experimental groups performed either two or 10 MVC-ISO of the elbow flexors at a long muscle length (20 degrees flexion) 2 days prior to 30 maximal isokinetic eccentric contractions of the elbow flexors. Subjects in the control group performed the eccentric contractions without MVC-ISO. No significant changes in maximal voluntary concentric contraction peak torque, peak torque angle, range of motion, upper arm circumference, plasma creatine kinase (CK) activity and myoglobin concentration, muscle soreness, and ultrasound echo intensity were evident after MVC-ISO. Changes in the variables following eccentric contractions were smaller (P < 0.05) for the 2 MVC-ISO group (e. g., peak torque loss at 5 days after exercise, 23% +/- 3%; peak CK activity, 1964 +/- 452 IU.L-1; peak muscle soreness, 46 +/- 4 mm) or the 10 MVC-ISO group (13% +/- 3%, 877 +/- 198 IU.L-1, 30 +/- 4 mm) compared with the control (34% +/- 4%, 6192 +/- 1747 IU.L-1, 66 +/- 5 mm). The 10 MVC-ISO group showed smaller (P < 0.05) changes in all variables following eccentric contractions compared with the 2 MVC-ISO group. Therefore, two MVC-ISO conferred potent protective effects against muscle damage, whereas greater protective effect was induced by 10 MVC-ISO, which can be used as a strategy to minimize muscle damage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据