4.5 Article

The stability of lyophilized lipid/DNA complexes during prolonged storage

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 93, 期 9, 页码 2259-2273

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/jps.20138

关键词

nonviral vectors; lyophilization; storage stability; reactive oxygen species; gene delivery; dehydration; cationic lipids; DNA

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM60587-01] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is well known that excipients are required to protect nonviral vectors during the lyophilization process. The goal of this study is to describe the stability of lyophilized nonviral vector preparations on pharmaceutically relevant timescales and provide insight into the factors that govern long-term stability of vectors in the dried state. Lipid/DNA complexes were lyophilized in glucose, sucrose, or trehalose and stored for a period of up to 2 years at five different temperatures (-20,4,22, 40, 60degreesC). We evaluated simultaneously the physico-chemical characteristics (size, zeta potential, ethidium. bromide (EtBr) accessibility, supercoiled DNA content) and the ability of vector formulations to transfect COS-7 cells at different time intervals. In addition, a fluorescence assay was utilized to assess levels of ROS in the dried cake after storage. The physical state of each formulation was evaluated by determination of the glass transition temperature and residual moisture content, before and after storage. Results from our stability study show that a progressive degradation of lipid/DNA complexes occurs in terms of transfection rates, particle size, dye accessibility, and supercoil content, even when samples are stored at low temperatures (e.g., -20degreesC). Furthermore, our preliminary results on the quantification of free radicals in rehydrated formulations emphasize the importance of developing strategies to prevent the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) during prolonged storage in the dried state. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据