4.6 Article

Changes in respiration in NREM sleep in hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
卷 559, 期 2, 页码 663-673

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.066084

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sleep hypoventilation is common in hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and may contribute to daytime hypercapnia. The contributions of respiratory drive and respiratory mechanics to alterations in minute ventilation (V-I) during sleep in this group have not been assessed. We assessed V-I, breathing pattern, upper airway and total lung resistance (UAR, R-L), intraoesohageal diaphragmatic EMG (EMG(oes)), intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi), dynamic compliance (C-dyn), pressure-time product of oesophageal pressure (PTPoes), tension-time index of the diaphragm (TTIdi), end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) and respiratory drive (assessed as the slope of P-oes versus time in the isovolumetric interval before PEEPi is overcome). Measurements were made in wakefulness and non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep, on 76%N-2/24%O-2 and on 76%He/24%O-2 (heliox). Satisfactory data for analysis were obtained in 10 patients; five had measurements on heliox. V-I fell from (mean (S.E.M.)) 8.84(0.46) to 6.64(0.91 l min(-1), P = 0.011) between wakefulness and stage II sleep, due to a fall in tidal volume. No changes were seen in PEEPi, C-dyn, EELV, PTPoes, TTIdi, EMG(oes) or respiratory drive. UAR increased 3.11(0.8) to 10.24(2.96) cmH(2)O l(-1) s (P = 0.013) but R-L was unchanged. UAR was reduced on heliox (5.20(1.67) to 3.45(1.35) cmH(2)O l(-1) s, P = 0.049) but V-I during sleep did not increase. PTPoes (350.2(51.0) to 259.4(46.3) cmH(2)O s min(-1), P = 0.016), TTIdi (0.13(0.02) to 0.10(0.02) P = 0.04), and respiratory drive (20.48(4.69) to 15.02(4.57) cmH(2)O s(-1), P = 0.01) were all reduced. This suggests respiratory drive alters to maintain a preset V-I in sleep, irrespective of load, at least while the fatigue threshold of respiratory muscles is not exceeded.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据