4.2 Article

Cisplatin, paclitaxel and escalating doses of doxorubicin (TAP) in advanced ovarian cancer: a phase I trial

期刊

JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 34, 期 9, 页码 540-546

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyh098

关键词

ovarian cancer; chemotherapy; doxorubicin; phase I study

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The objectives of this phase I trial were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended dose (RD) for phase II/III trials of doxorubicin (DOX) combined with paclitaxel (PTX) and cisplatin (CDDP) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC). Methods: Twenty-eight patients with stage III/IV AOC received fixed doses of PTX (110 mg/m(2) over 24 h on day 1) and CDDP (75 mg/m(2) on day 2) and an escalating dose of DOX (20, 30, 40 or 50 mg/m(2) on day 1) every 3 weeks. The patients received up to six cycles of chemotherapy. At level 1, one of the original dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), grade (G) 4 neutropenia lasting for 4 days or longer, occurred in four of six patients. The criterion for DLT was amended to 'G4 neutropenia lasting for 8 days or longer accompanied with G4 leukopenia' and four additional patients were evaluated at level 1. Results: According to the new criteria, DLT was observed only in one of nine patients except one ineligible patient at level land two of six patients at level 4. G4 neutropenia and G4 leukopenia occurred in 85% and 44%, respectively, in the first course of chemotherapy. Non-hematological toxicity was generally mild or moderate. MTD was not determined at the planned dose levels. A clinical response was observed in 16 of 19 (84%) evaluable patients. Further dose escalation was not performed and RD was determined as level 4 because more than 30% of cycles required some modification of chemotherapy at level 4. Conclusion: The combination of TAP including 50 mg/m(2) of DOX is feasible and well tolerated as first line chemotherapy in AOC, warranting further study of this regimen.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据