4.7 Article

Yellow-bellied marmot population dynamics: Demographic mechanisms of growth and decline

期刊

ECOLOGY
卷 85, 期 9, 页码 2446-2455

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1890/03-0513

关键词

demographic mechanisms of population dynamics; elasticity analysis; LTRE analysis; Marmota flaviventris; partial life-cycle model; population dynamics and regulation; yellow-bellied marmot demography

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multiple environmental factors may act synergistically to influence demographic characteristics, and ultimately the dynamics, of biological populations. Using prospective and retrospective analyses of demographic data from a 40-year study of individually marked animals, we investigated the demographic mechanisms of the temporal and spatial dynamics of a yellow-bellied marmot (Marmota flaviventris) population. Prospective elasticity analyses indicated juvenile survival (P-j) would have the largest relative influence on the projected population growth rate (lambda). Relative magnitudes of elasticities did not differ between years characterized by positive (lambda > 1.0) and negative (lambda < 1.0) population growth. However, retrospective analyses of a life table response experiment (LTRE) revealed that changes in fertility (F), followed by age of first reproduction (alpha) made the largest contributions to observed annual changes in lambda. Changes in F and alpha made the largest contributions to annual declines in lambda, whereas changes in P-j also were important to cause increases in lambda. Population dynamic differences among marmot colonies were due primarily to spatial variations in alpha and P-j. Our results indicate that changes in reproductive parameters (a and F) primarily drive the temporal dynamics of our study population, and that demographic mechanisms of population increases might differ from those of population declines. Studies of the regulation of yellow-bellied marmot populations should focus on the factors or processes influencing reproductive parameters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据