3.8 Article

Reduced NAA in motor and non-motor brain regions in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study

期刊

AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS
卷 5, 期 3, 页码 141-149

出版社

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.1080/14660820410017109

关键词

amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging; magnetic resonance imaging

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS040321-03, R01 NS040321, R01 NS4032] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES: After replication of previous findings we aimed to: 1) determine if previously reported H-1 MRSI differences between ALS patients and control subjects are limited to the motor cortex; and 2) determine the longitudinal metabolic changes corresponding to varying levels of diagnostic certainty. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with possible/ suspected ALS, 24 patients with probable/ definite ALS and 17 control subjects underwent multislice H-1 MRSI co-registered with tissue-segmented MRI to obtain concentrations of the brain metabolites N-acetylaspartate (NAA), creatine, and choline in the left and right motor cortex and in gray matter and white matter of non-motor regions in the brain. RESULTS: In the more affected hemisphere, reductions in the ratios, NAA/Cho and NAA/ Cre+Cho were observed both within 12.6% and 9.5% respectively) and outside (9.2% and 7.3% respectively) the motor cortex in probable/definite ALS. However, these reductions were significantly greater within the motor cortex (P< 0.05 for NAA/ Cho and P< 0.005 for NAA/Cre+Cho). Longitudinal changes in NAA were observed at three months within the motor cortex of both possible/suspected ALS patients ( P< 0.005) and at nine months outside the motor cortex of probable/definite patients ( P< 0.005). However, there was no clear pattern of progressive change over time. CONCLUSIONS: NAA ratios are reduced in the motor cortex and outside the motor cortex in ALS, suggesting widespread neuronal injury. Longitudinal changes of NAA are not reliable, suggesting that NAA may not be a useful surrogate marker for treatment trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据