4.5 Article

Effects of 10-day confinement on the immune system and psychological aspects in humans

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 97, 期 3, 页码 920-924

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00043.2004

关键词

CD69; mitogenic reaction; stress; granulocyte; natural killer cell

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the changes in percentages of leukocyte subpopulations, natural killer (NK) cells, CD69-expressing lymphocytes, and psychological aspects in 10 subjects who participated in a 10-day confinement study. Suppression of lymphocyte proliferative reaction and changes in leukocyte distribution are known to occur in space. These responses are similar to those induced by psychological stress. Ground-based confinement studies are suitable for validating the effects of stress arising only due to confinement. Two groups, consisting of five male subjects (ages 20-27 yr, mean 22.8 yr) each, participated in a 10-day confinement study. Blood samples were taken once before, three times during, and once after the confinement and activated with an anti-CD2 agonistic antibody cocktail. The percentages of leukocyte subpopulations, NK (CD45(+)CD56(+)) cells, and activated lymphocytes (CD45(+)CD69(+)) were measured by flow cytometric assay. The face scale test was used to measure psychological aspects. The percentage of CD69(+) lymphocytes decreased during the period of confinement. This was mostly caused by changes in the ratio between NK and non-NK lymphocytes. The face scale showed that the subjects' moods improved toward the postconfinement period. Consistent with the face scale, the percentages of innate immune cells, such as NK cells and granulocytes, increased during the postconfinement period. We concluded that the changes in the distribution of immune cells caused by stress plays an important role in suppression of proliferative reactivity. The observed physiological reactions were specific to the confined environment, and the stress caused by confinement plays a role in the immune changes observed in space.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据