4.1 Review

Glutamine metabolism - Role in acid-base balance

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bmb.2004.494032050388

关键词

glutamine; metabolic acidosis; glutaminase; glutamine synthetase; phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The intent of this review is to provide a broad overview of the interorgan metabolism of glutamine and to discuss in more detail its role in acid-base balance. Muscle, adipose tissue, and the lungs are the primary sites of glutamine synthesis and release. During normal acid-base balance, the small intestine and the liver are the major sites of glutamine utilization. The periportal hepatocytes catabolize glutamine and convert ammonium and bicarbonate ions to urea. In contrast, the perivenous hepatocytes are capable of synthesizing glutamine. During metabolic acidosis, the kidney becomes the major site of glutamine extraction and catabolism. This process generates ammonium ions that are excreted in the urine to facilitate the excretion of acids and bicarbonate ions that are transported to the blood to partially compensate the acidosis. The increased renal extraction of glutamine is balanced by an increased release from muscle and liver and by a decreased utilization in the intestine. During chronic acidosis, this adaptation is sustained, in part, by increased renal expression of genes that encode various transport proteins and key enzymes of glutamine metabolism. The increased levels of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase result from increased transcription, while the increase in glutaminase and glutamate dehydrogenase activities result from stabilization of their respective mRNAs. Where feasible, this review draws upon data obtained from studies in humans. Studies conducted in model animals are discussed where available data from humans is either lacking or not firmly established. Because there are quantitative differences in tissue utilization and synthesis of glutamine in different mammals, the review will focus more on common principles than on quantification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据