4.0 Article

APOE and APOC1 promoter polymorphisms and the risk of Alzheimer disease in African American and Caribbean Hispanic individuals

期刊

ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY
卷 61, 期 9, 页码 1434-1439

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archneur.61.9.1434

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG 08702, AG 15473, AG 07232] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The APOE epsilon4 allele is a genetic risk factor for Alzheimer disease (AD), though the strength of the association varies by ethnic group. Polymorphisms in regulatory sequences of APOE have also been related to AD, but the effects are inconsistent across studies. Methods: We examined the association between AD and variants in 3 APOE promoters and in the promoter of the adjacent APOC1 gene in African American and Caribbean Hispanic individuals. Polymorphisms tested were the -491A/T, -427T/C, and -219G/T (Th1/E47cs) in the APOE promoter and the Hpa1 variant in the APOC1 promoter. Using standard research criteria for AD, overall odds ratios were computed and repeated stratified by presence or absence of APOE epsilon4. Results: The APOC1 Hpal+ variant was associated with AD in Caribbean Hispanic individuals, but strong linkage disequilibrium with the APOE epsilon4 allele indicated that this was not an independent effect. No promoter variant in APOE or APOC1 was associated with AD before or after adjusting for age, education, sex, and multiple comparisons. Estimated haplotypes including -219G/T, APOE, and APOC 1 differed significantly in Caribbean Hispanic patients and controls but not in African American participants. This effect was primarily owing to the -219G/ T-APOE haplotype, but we did not detect significant allele-specific differences in promoter activity comparing reporter constructs containing the APOE -219G and -219 T alleles. Conclusion: These findings exclude a strong or independent influence of APOE or APOC1 promoter polymorphisms on the variation in APOE-related risk of AD in African American and Caribbean Hispanic individuals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据