期刊
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
卷 36, 期 9, 页码 1567-1573出版社
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000139806.53824.2E
关键词
exercise; walking; survey; surveillance; variability
资金
- ODCDC CDC HHS [U48/CCU409664, U36/CCU300430-20] Funding Source: Medline
Purpose: The dual purposes of this study were: 1) to provide preliminary descriptive epidemiology data representing pedometer-determined physical activity (PA) and 2) to explore sources of intra-individual variability in steps per day. Methods: All participants (76 males, age 48.4 +/- 16.3 yr, body mass index (BMI) = 27.1 +/- 5.1 kg(.)m(-2); 133 females, age = 47.4 +/- 17.5 yr, BMI = 26.9 +/- 5.7 kg(.)m(-2)) resided in Sumter County, SC, and were recruited by telephone to receive a mailed kit to self-monitor PA for 1 wk. Statistical analyses compared mean steps per day between sexes, races, age groups, education and income levels, and BMI categories. Mean steps per day were also compared between: 1) weekdays versus weekend days, 2) workdays versus nonworkdays, and 3) days of sport/exercise versus no participation. Results: The entire sample took 5931 +/- 3664 steps(.)d(-1) (males = 7192 +/- 3596 vs females = 5210 +/- 3518 steps(.)d(-1), t = 7.88, P < 0.0001). Significant differences were also indicated by race, age, education, income, and BMI. In addition, weekdays were significantly higher than weekend days, workdays were higher than nonworkdays, and sport/exercise days were higher than nonsport/exercise days. Conclusions: The large standard deviations reflect a wide distribution of ambulatory behavior. Regardless, important differences are still evident by demographic characteristics, BMI categories, day of the week, and reported engagement in work or sport/exercise.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据