4.7 Article

Quantitative measurement of neurodegeneration in an ALS-PDC model using MR microscopy

期刊

NEUROIMAGE
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 336-343

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.026

关键词

magnetic resonance microscopy; ALS; ALS-PDC; Parkinsonism; volumetrics; CNS; motor deficits; cycad; neurodegeneration

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P41-RR016105] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exposure to cycad (Cycas micronesica K.D. Hill) toxins via diet has been shown to induce neurodegeneration in vivo that mimics the progressive neurological disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-parkinsonism dementia complex (ALS-PDC). In previous studies, specific cortical and subcortical cell loss was measured with conventional stained sections. In the present study, magnetic resonance (MR) microscopy was used to examine neurodegeneration in three dimensions (3D) in isolated intact brains and spinal cords. Mice were fed washed cycad for 2 months and showed progressive motor deficits resembling human ALS-PDC. CNS tissue was imaged at 17.6 T. T-2* scans were acquired on both spinal cord and brain samples with an isotropic resolution of 41 mum. Through MR volumetrics, cycad-fed mice showed significantly decreased volumes in lumbar spinal cord gray matter, substantia nigra, striatum, basal nucleus/internal capsule, and olfactory bulb. Cortical measurements of conventionally stained sections revealed that cycad-fed mice also showed decreased cortical thickness. These results show that MR microscopy (MRM) is sensitive enough to measure degeneration in this early stage model of a progressive neurological disease with strong correlations to behavioral deficits and histological results and may be applicable in vivo to the same model. Similar analysis may be used in the future as a diagnostic aid in tracking the early progression of neurological disorders in preclinical human subjects. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据