4.5 Article

Investigations on nanoparticle-chromophore and interchromophore interactions in pyrene-capped gold nanoparticles

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 108, 期 35, 页码 13265-13272

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp048321a

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three pyrene alkanethiol derivatives (P1, P2, and P3) possessing flexible alkyl groups of different lengths were attached to nanoparticles of gold (similar to2-3 nm in size) along with dodecanethiol (Au-P1, Au-P2, and Au-P3). The photophysical properties of these systems were investigated as a function of (i) distance of chromophore from gold core, (ii) concentration of pyrene on gold surface, and (iii) solvent polarity. The structured absorption bands of the pyrene chromophore were significantly perturbed near the surface of gold nanoparticles (Au-P1), indicating a strong ground state interaction between the plasmon electrons of Au nanoparticles and thepi-electron cloud of the chromophore. Such effects were not observed in Au-P2 and Au-P3 systems, in which the linker groups are long enough to prevent any ground state interactions. A gradual increase in the peak intensity ratio of band III/I of the normal fluorescence of pyrene chromophore was found with an increase in length of the spacer group. These results indicate that the local environment close to the surface of the An nanoparticle is more polar compared to the bulk medium. Interchromophoric interactions are limited in the Au-P1 system due to the restriction imposed by the curvature of spherical gold nanoparticle whereas the flexible alkyl chain tethering pyrene in Au-P2/Au-P3 allows free interaction between chromophores. Steady state and time-resolved emission studies indicate that the normal fluorescence and intermolecular excimer formation are the main deactivation channels of the singlet excited state of pyrene linked to An nanoparticles, in nonpolar solvents. In contrast, the competitive electron transfer to the gold nanocore dominates in polar solvents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据