4.7 Review

Influence of mechanical, cellular, and molecular factors on collateral artery growth (arteriogenesis)

期刊

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
卷 95, 期 5, 页码 449-458

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.RES.0000141145.78900.44

关键词

arteriogenesis; shear stress; monocytes; vascular remodeling; leukocytes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Growth of collateral blood vessels (arteriogenesis) is potentially able to preserve structure and function of limbs and organs after occlusion of a major artery. The success of the remodeling process depends on the following conditions: ( 1) existence of an arteriolar network that connects the preocclusive with the postocclusive microcirculation; ( 2) activation of the arteriolar endothelium by elevated fluid shear stress; ( 3) invasion ( but not incorporation) of bone marrow - derived cells; and ( 4) proliferation of endothelial and smooth muscle cells. Most organs of most mammals including man can rely on the existence of interconnecting arterioles in most organs and tissues with heart being the exception in rodents and pigs. Arterial occlusion lowers the pressure in the distal vasculature thereby creating a pressure gradient favoring increased flow through preexisting collaterals. This increases fluid shear stress leading to endothelial activation with cellular edema, upregulation of adhesion molecules, mitogenic-, thrombogenic-, and fibrinolytic factors, leading to monocyte invasion with matrix digestion. Smooth muscle cells migrate and proliferate and the vessel enlarges under the influence of increasing circumferential wall stress. Growth factors involved belong to the FGF family and signaling proceeds via the Ras/Raf- and the Rho cascades. Increases in vascular radius and wall thickness restore fluid shear stress and circumferential wall stress to normal levels and growth stops. Although increases in collateral vessel size are very substantial their maximal conductance amounts to only 40% of normal. Forced increases in FSS can reach almost 100%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据