4.4 Article

Determinants within gp120 and gp41 contribute to CD4 independence of SIV Envs

期刊

VIROLOGY
卷 327, 期 1, 页码 16-25

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2004.03.016

关键词

simian immunodeficiency virus; Env; neutralization

类别

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [F32 AI 10577] Funding Source: Medline
  2. PHS HHS [R01 40880, R01 45378] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Entry of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) into cells is mediated by binding of the viral envelope (Env) glycoprotein to cellular CD4 and chemokine receptor molecules. Interaction of the Env gp120 subunit with CD4 induces conformational changes that result in exposure of a conserved coreceptor binding site. The chemokine receptor CCR5 is the major coreceptor used for SIV entry. Many SIV Envs have the ability to bind directly to CCR5 in the absence of CD4, and CD4-independent SIVs have been shown to exhibit macrophage tropism, enhanced neutralization sensitivity, and reduced pathogenicity in nonhuman primates. SIVmac239 is a pathogenic, T-tropic, neutralization-resistant virus which encodes a CD4-dependent Env. By contrast, the SIVmac316 virus, which differs from 239 in Env by only eight amino acid substitutions and a gp41 cytoplasmic domain truncation, exhibits macrophage tropism in vitro, attenuated pathogenesis, neutralization sensitivity, and CD4-independent entry. We mapped the residues contributing to CD4-independent entry to substitutions at position 165 in the V1/V2 region of gp120 and position 573 of gp41. We find that substitution of both residues in replication-competent SIVmac239 virus results in gain of CD4 independence and enhanced neutralization sensitivity. By contrast, the converse substitutions placed in the background of SIVmac316 resulted in loss of CD4 independence and decreased neutralization sensitivity. Thus, as few as two amino acid changes can have dramatic effects on SIV Env phenotype. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据