4.6 Article

Beneficial effect of angiotensin-blocking agents on graft fibrosis in hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION
卷 78, 期 5, 页码 686-691

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000128913.09774.ce

关键词

liver transplantation; hepatitis c recurrence; fibrosis; angiotensin-blocking agents

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation is often associated with accelerated graft fibrosis and progression to cirrhosis. Because drugs blocking the action of angiotensin-II can reduce fibrosis in different human and experimental models, we assessed the possible beneficial effect of these drugs on graft fibrosis in hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 128 liver-transplant recipients with hepatitis C recurrence. Twenty-seven patients (group I) received angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-II receptor antagonists as antihypertensive treatment, and 101 patients (group II) did not receive these drugs. Results. No significant differences were found between groups I and II in demographic, clinical, and laboratory data. In contrast, cirrhosis in the graft was less frequently observed in group I than in group II during postransplant follow-up: 15% versus 35% (P=0.035), respectively, with a probability of cirrhosis of 9% versus 32% at 5 years after transplantation and 35% versus 70% at 10 years (P=0.0049). Furthermore, the fibrosis stage (scored from 0-4) in the liver biopsy obtained at the end of follow-up was significantly lower in group I than in group II (median [and range]: 1 [0-4] vs. 2 [0-4]; P=0.038), and the fibrosis progression index (increase of fibrosis stage per year) was also lower in group I than in group II (0.21 [0-0.45] vs. 0.52 [0-2.58]; P=0.006). Conclusion. The administration of angiotensin-blocking agents may be beneficial to reduce the development of graft fibrosis in hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据