4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Modulation of fluorouracil by leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: An updated meta-analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 22, 期 18, 页码 3766-3775

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.03.104

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose The modulation of fluorouracil (FU) by folinic acid (leucovorin [LV]) has been shown to be effective in terms of tumor response rate in patients with advanced colorectal cancer, but a meta-analysis of nine trials previously published by our group failed to demonstrate a statistically significant survival difference between FU and FU-LV. We present an update of the meta-analysis, with a longer follow-up and the inclusion of 10 newer trials. Patients and Methods Analyses are based on individual data from 3,300 patients randomized in 19 trials on an intent-to-treat basis. Two trials had multiple comparisons, leading to a total of 21 pair-wise comparisons. FU doses were similar in both arms in 10 pair-wise comparisons, 15% to 33% higher in the FU-alone arm in six comparisons and more than 66% higher, in five comparisons. Results Overall analysis showed a two-fold increase in tumor response rates (11% for FU-LV v 21% for FU alone; odds ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.63; P < .0001) and a small but statistically significant overall survival benefit for FU-LV over FU alone (median survival, 11.7 v 10.5 months, respectively; hazards ratio 0.90; 95% CI 0.87 to 0 94; P = 004), which were primarily seen in the first year. We observed a significant interaction between treatment benefit and dose of FU with tumor response and overall survival, advantages of FU-LV over FU-alone being restricted to trials in which a similar dose of FU was prescribed in both arms. Conclusion This updated analysis demonstrates, on a large data set, that FU-LV improves both response rate and overall survival compared with FU alone and that this benefit is consistent across various prognostic factors. (C) 2004 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据