4.6 Article

Quantitative and qualitative differences in the in vivo response of NKT cells to distinct α- and β-anomeric glycolipids

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 173, 期 6, 页码 3693-3706

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.6.3693

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL68744] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI43407, R01 AI043407, AI42284, AI50953, R01 AI043407-08] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [NS44044] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NKT cells represent a unique subset of immunoregulatory, T cells that recognize glycolipid Ags presented by the MHC class 1-like molecule CD1d. Because of their immunoregulatory properties, NKT cells are attractive targets for the development of immunotherapies. The prototypical NKT cell ligand alpha-galactosylceramide (alpha-GalCer), originally isolated from a marine sponge, has potent immunomodulatory activities in mice, demonstrating therapeutic efficacy against metastatic tumors, infections, and autoimmune diseases, but also has a number of adverse side effects. In vivo administration of alpha-GalCer to mice results in the rapid activation of NKT cells, which is characterized by cytokine secretion, surface receptor down-regulation, expansion, and secondary activation of a variety of innate and adaptive immune system cells. In this study, we have evaluated the in vivo immune response of mice to a set of structural analogues of alpha-GalCer. Our results show that, contrary to current thinking, beta-anomeric GalCer can induce CD1d-dependent biological activities in mice, albeit at lower potency than alpha-anomeric GalCer. In addition, we show that the response of NKT cells to distinct GalCer differs not only quantitatively, but also qualitatively. These findings indicate that NKT cells can fine-tune their immune responses to distinct glycolipid Ags in vivo, a property that may be exploited for the development of effective and safe NKT cell-based immunotherapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据