4.8 Article

Electrogenerated chemiluminescence.: 77.: DNA hybridization detection at high amplification with [Ru(bpy)3]2+-containing microspheres

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 76, 期 18, 页码 5379-5386

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac0495236

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An ultrasensitive DNA hybridization detection method based on electrogenerated chemiluminescence (ECL) using polystyrene microspheres/beads (PSB) as the carrier of the ECL labels, namely, tris(2,2'-bipyridyl)ruthenium(II) tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)borate (Ru(bpy)(3)-[B(C6F5)(4)](2)), is reported. Probe single-stranded DNA (p-ssDNA) was attached to the surface of magnetic beads (MB) and hybridized with target-ssDNA (t-ssDNA) with immobilized PSB containing a large number of water insoluble Ru(bpy)(3)[B(C6F5)(4)](2) species (similar to7.5 x 10(9) molecules/bead). With this approach a large amplification factor of Ru(bpy)(3)[B(C6F5)(4)](2) molecules for each t-ssDNA can be achieved, when each PSB is attached to a limited number of t-ssDNA. The p-ssDNA-MB <----> t-ssDNA-PSB/ Ru(bpy)(3)(2+) conjugates formed were magnetically separated from the reaction media and dissolved in MeCN containing tri-n-propylamine (TPrA) as an ECL coreactant. ECL was produced with a potential scan from 0 to 3.0 V versus Ag/Ag+, and the integrated ECL intensity was found to be linearly proportional to the t-ssDNA concentration in a range of 1.0 fM to 10 nM under optimized conditions. ECL signals associated with two base pair mismatched ssDNA and noncomplementary ssDNA can be distinguished well from the ECL signal related to the complementary DNA hybridization. A Poisson distribution is followed when a large number of MB reacts with PSB, and the minimum number of 1.0- and 2.8-mum diameter MB required to bind and magnetically separate a single 10-mum diameter PSB from the reaction solution was estimated to be three and one, respectively. The principle described in this paper could be also applied to many other ECL analyses, such as immunoassays.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据