4.6 Article

Sphingosine contributes to glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis of thymocytes independently of the mitochondrial pathway

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 173, 期 6, 页码 3783-3790

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.6.3783

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During the selection process in the thymus, most thymocytes are eliminated by apoptosis through signaling via TCR or glucocorticoids. The involvement of ceramide (Cer) and sphingosine (SP), important apoptotic mediators, remains poorly defined in glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis. We report that, in mouse thymocytes, apoptosis triggered by 10(-6) M dexamethasone (DX) was preceded by a caspase-dependent Cer and SP generation, together with activation of acidic and neutral ceramidases. Apoptosis was drastically reduced by blocking either sphingolipid production (by acid sphingomyelinase inhibitor) or SP production (by ceramidase inhibitors), but not by inhibition of de novo Cer synthesis. Thus, SP generated through acid sphingomyelinase and ceramidase activity would contribute to the apoptotic effect of DX. Consistent with this hypothesis, SP addition or inhibition of SP kinase induced thymocyte apoptosis. DX induced a proteasome-dependent loss of mitochondrial membrane potential (DeltaPsi(m)) and caspase-8, -3, and -9 processing. Apoptosis was abolished by inhibition of DeltaPsi(m) loss or caspase-8 or -3, but not caspase-9. DeltaPsi(m) loss was independent of SP production and caspase-8, -3, and -9 activation. However, inhibition of SP production reduced caspase-8 and -3, but not caspase-9 processing. Proteasome inhibition impaired activation of the three caspases, whereas inhibition of DeltaPsi(m) loss solely blocked caspase-9 activation. These data indicate that DX-induced apoptosis is mediated in part by SP, which contributes, together with proteasome activity, to caspase-8-3 processing independently of mitochondria, and in part by the proteasome/mitochondria pathway, although independently of caspase-9 activation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据