4.7 Article

Assessment of age-related glucose oxidation rates of broiler chickens by using stable isotopes

期刊

LIFE SCIENCES
卷 75, 期 18, 页码 2245-2255

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2004.05.016

关键词

broiler chickens; age; glucose oxidation; stable isotopes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During their relatively short commercial lifespan of six weeks, broiler chickens undergo very pronounced age- or body weight-related changes in metabolic rate and body composition. The present study was aimed to assess the age-related changes in glucose oxidation rate of broiler chickens by using C-13-labeled glucose. The methodology for this breath test needed to be established first. Broiler chickens aged from two to six weeks were placed in open-circuit respiration cells and received a single intubation of U-C-13(6)-glucose, followed by breath sampling for 4 hours and mass spectrometric analysis of C-13: C-12 ratio in the exhaled air. Simultaneously, CO2 concentration in the respiration cell air was continuously monitored in order to calculate the cumulative percentage dose recovery (CPDR). With respect to, the methodology, an oral dose of 2 mg U-C-13(6)-glucose per kg body weight while maintaining a CO2 in the concentration of 0.4 to 0.5% was considered to be optimal. The three-parameter Gompertz curve fitted the CPDR values very well. Pronounced age-related changes in exogenous glucose oxidation rates in rapidly growing meat-type chickens were assessed. Young broiler chickens spend only a relatively low percentage of ingested glucose for immediate oxidation. In contrast, broiler chickens approaching the age of maximal absolute growth rate oxidize a greater proportion of the recently ingested glucose relative to the non-oxidative disposal pathways. This shift in the exogenous partitioning is discussed in relation to age-dependent changes in glucose turnover, lipid oxidation and deposition and metabolic heat production. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据