4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

On the coarse-graining of polymers into bead-spring chains

期刊

JOURNAL OF NON-NEWTONIAN FLUID MECHANICS
卷 122, 期 1-3, 页码 3-31

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2003.10.006

关键词

coarse-graining; bead-spring models; statistical mechanics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a study of the coarse-Braining of polymers into bead-spring chains using statistical mechanics. The force-extension behavior is examined at different levels of coarse-Braining. A direct result of the springs being decoupled is that the force-extension behavior depends only on the number of flexibility lengths (e.g. persistence or Kuhn lengths) represented by each spring. This dimensionless parameter is found to govern the fluctuations around the mean extension, analogous to the conventional role of temperature. The use of an effective flexibility length to correct the model behavior is analyzed, and we have calculated bounds on the choices of this correction factor. The analytic nature of the statistical mechanical framework has also allowed for the calculation of asymptotic and universal behavior. The zero Weissenberg number rheological behavior is examined using the retarded-motion expansion coefficients of bead-spring chains at different levels of coarse-Braining. The results show the trade-off between using too few or too many springs. The general framework to analyze the force-extension and rheological behavior is applied to the worm-like chain, FENE, and Fraenkel models. We introduce a new method for coarse-Braining a polymer into a bead-spring chain called the Polymer Ensemble Transformation (PET) method. Application to the freely jointed chain polymer yields a set of spring force-laws called the Random Walk Spring (RWS) model. This new method illustrates why the previous spring force-laws cannot be used to finely discretize polymers and also provides new insight into how to rationally proceed in the coarse-Braining of polymers into bead-spring chains. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据