4.7 Article

Concomitant tumor immunity to a poorly immunogenic melanoma is prevented by regulatory T cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 200, 期 6, 页码 771-782

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20041130

关键词

melanocyte differentiation antigen; cancer immunity; immune suppression; GITR; cyclophosphamide

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P01 CA033049, T32 CA09149, T32 CA009149, P01 CA047179, P01 CA33049, R01 CA056821, R01 CA56821, CA47179, CA59350, P01 CA059350] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Concomitant tumor immunity describes immune responses in a host with a progressive tumor that rejects the same tumor at a remote site. In this work, concomitant tumor immunity was investigated in mice bearing poorly immunogenic B16 melanoma. Progression of B16 tumors did not spontaneously elicit concomitant immunity. However, depletion of CD4(+) T cells in tumor-bearing mice resulted in CD8(+) T cell-mediated rejection of challenge tumors given on day 6. Concomitant immunity was also elicited by treatment with cyclophosphamide or DTA-1 monoclonal antibody against the glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor. Immunity elicited by B16 melanoma cross-reacted with a distinct syngeneic melanoma, but not with nonmelanoma tumors. Furthermore, CD8(+) T cells from mice with concomitant immunity specifically responded to major histocompatibility complex class I-restricted epitopes of two melanocyte differentiation antigens. RAG1(-/-) mice adoptively transferred with CD8(+) and CD4(+) T cells lacking the CD4(+)CD25(+) compartment mounted robust concomitant immunity, which was suppressed by readdition of CD4(+)CD25(+) cells. Naturally occurring CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells efficiently suppressed concomitant immunity mediated by previously activated CD8(+) T cells, demonstrating that precursor regulatory T cells in naive hosts give rise to effective suppressors. These results show that regulatory T cells are the major regulators of concomitant tumor immunity against this weakly immunogenic tumor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据