4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Resolution in quartz crystal oscillator circuits for high sensitivity microbalance sensors in damping media

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 103, 期 1-2, 页码 318-324

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2004.04.060

关键词

quartz crystal microbalance; electronic oscillator; frequency stability; mass sensitivity; resolution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of quartz crystal oscillators as high sensitivity microbalance sensors is limited by the frequency noise present in the circuit. To characterise the behaviour of the sensors, it is not enough to determine their experimental sensitivity, but rather it is essential to study the frequency fluctuations in order to establish the sensor resolution. This is fundamental in the case of oscillators for damping media, because the level of noise rises due to the strong decline of the quality factor of the resonator. In this paper, a comparative study of noise and resolution is presented with respect to the frequency and the quality factor. The study has been made using four oscillators designed to be used in quartz crystal microbalance sensors in damping media. The four circuits have been designed at increasing frequencies in order to improve the sensitivity. Also, the current resolution limit of a microbalance oscillator is determined using an AT resonator, since this does not depend on the frequency. However, when working in liquid, the damping of the resonator makes the resolution diminish due to a worsening the quality factor. The relationship between the resolution limit and the frequency and characteristics of the liquid medium has been determined. The resolution worsens when the density and viscosity of the liquid is increased. However, in this case, the increase in frequency implies a small increase in the resolution. Therefore, when working below the maximum quality factor, for similar values, the resolution can be improved by elevating the work frequency. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据