4.7 Article

Changes in lymphocyte subsets after short-term pharmacotherapy in patients with panic disorder

期刊

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
卷 128, 期 2, 页码 183-190

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2004.05.015

关键词

panic disorder; immunity; T lymphocytes; B lymphocytes; drug therapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Panic disorder is associated with a high frequency of comorbid immunological diseases, such as allergies and asthma, although the psychoneuroinumnology of panic disorder is relatively unexplored. The objective of this study was to determine whether panic patients have different immunological findings compared with normal healthy subjects and whether changes in immune function are associated with short-terns pharmacotherapy. We also examined whether immunological variables were associated with clinical severity and serum catecholamine levels. Patients with panic disorder (n=26) and healthy control subjects (n=26) were recruited for this study. All patients were treated with paroxetine for 3 months. We measured the lymphocyte subsets, psychopathological characteristics and serum catecholamine (norepinephrine and epinephrine) levels. Panic patients did not differ initially from control subjects in peripheral lymphocyte phenotypic markers. After drug therapy, however, percentages of circulating CD3(+), CD4(+) and CD8(+) T lymphocytes were significantly increased, while the percentage of CD19(+) B lymphocytes was significantly decreased in the patients. The difference in the percentage of CD8(+) T lymphocytes before and after treatment was negatively correlated with pretreatment Global Clinical Impression scores. The lymphocyte subsets were not significantly associated with serum catecholamine levels in panic patients. In conclusion, panic patients showed increased CD3(+), CD4(+) and CD8(+) T lymphocyte proportions and a decreased B lymphocyte proportion after 3 months of drug therapy. This finding suggests that pharmacological treatment may affect immune function in panic patients. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据