4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Bulk and grain boundary resistivities of donor-doped barium titanate ceramics

期刊

SOLID STATE IONICS
卷 173, 期 1-4, 页码 69-75

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssi.2004.07.054

关键词

grain boundary resistivity; bulk resistivity; impedance spectroscopy; donor-doped BaTiO3

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The electrical properties of both the bulk and the grain boundaries of positive temperature coefficient (PTC) resistors have beer determined as a function of temperature ranging from 25 to 400 degreesC by application of impedance spectroscopy. The resistances of the bulk and the grain boundaries as well as the capacitance of the grain boundary re.-ions of n-conducting BaTiO3 ceramics have been obtained by fitting an appropriate equivalent circuit to the impedance spectra. Samples of equal dimensions and composition but different grain sizes (2.8 and 6.6 mum) have been investigated. Whereas the bulk resistance remains almost constant throughout the whole temperature range. the grain boundary resistance shows a steep increase of several orders of magnitude (PTC effect) above the Curie temperature (around 90 degreesC). The grain boundary resistances of the disk-shaped samples (dimensions: 2.2 mm thickness. 8.0 mm diameter) vary typically between 35 Omega and 30 MOmega, and the bulk resistances are found to be approximately 4 Omega (bulk resistivity: 10 Omega cm). The variation of the grain boundary capacitance with temperature, depending remarkably on the grain size of the samples. follows the Curie-Weiss law. Both the steep increase of the grain boundary resistance and the Curie-Weiss behaviour of the grain boundary capacitance are described theoretically by application of an extended Heywang model. The defect chemistry in the grain boundary regions is modelled by assuming Schottky type space charge depletion layers. Optimized values for the temperature-dependent energy level and the density of the acceptor type grain boundary states are given. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据