4.6 Article

Acceleressence: dark energy from a phase transition at the seesaw scale

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2004/10/011

关键词

dark energy theory; cosmological phase transitions; cosmology of theories beyond the SM

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Simple models are constructed for 'acceleressence' dark energy: the latent heat of a phase transition occurring in a hidden sector governed by the seesaw mass scale v(2)/M-Pl, where v is the electroweak scale and M-Pl the gravitational mass scale. In our models, the seesaw scale is stabilized by supersymmetry, implying that the LHC must discover superpartners with a spectrum that reflects a low scale of fundamental supersymmetry breaking. Newtonian gravity may be modified by effects arising from the exchange of fields in the acceleressence sector whose Compton wavelengths are typically of order the millimetre scale. There are two classes of models. In the first class the universe is currently in a metastable vacuum and will continue to in. ate until tunnelling processes eventually induce a first-order transition. In the simplest such model, the range of the new force is bounded to be larger than 25 mum in the absence of fine-tuning of parameters, and for couplings of order unity it is expected to be approximate to100 mum. In the second class of models thermal effects maintain the present vacuum energy of the universe, but on further cooling, the universe will 'soon' smoothly relax to a matter dominated era. In this case, the range of the new force is also expected to be of order the millimetre scale or larger, although its strength is uncertain. A firm prediction of this class of models is the existence of additional energy density in radiation at the eV era, which can potentially be probed in precision measurements of the cosmic microwave background. An interesting possibility is that the transition towards a matter dominated era has occurred in the very recent past, with the consequence that the universe is currently decelerating.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据